Butterscotch Pot de Creme

I can’t tell you how excited I am to share this recipe with you. It’s rich, deep and lush. But this recipe comes with a shocking surprise. The twist is not the dessert but the source of the recipe.

3 Butterscotch Pot de Creme2 9670

This dessert is brought to you by… (insert dramatic pause here) …GQ magazine! Yeap, that GQ magazine, magazine.

I’ve read GQ for decades and have never thought twice about checking out the pub’s food/recipe section. I mean, it’s GQ after all. I turn to GQ for style trends. Such as, if I want advice on pleated vs. flat front trousers (evidently, for men, always flat) or if I should cuff the bottom of my suit pants (supposedly no cuffs are more contemporary). But GQ for recipes? This would have never crossed my mind.

2 Sign Up Logo4 Mixing Milk Sugar Base 9560

But as I was flipping through the magazine I was stopped cold when I spotted a glistening spoonful of pot de crème. It was the color that first grabbed my attention – a mesmerizing and saturated deep amber hue. And that’s when I realized it was a butterscotch pot de crème. I knew then that I had to give this recipe some serious consideration.

5 Making Caramel 9583

6 Mixing Caramel and Milk Base 9592

And boy, am I glad that I did!

8 Mixing Butterscotch Custard 9552

It’s a beautiful dessert. Not too sweet. Just perfect, actually. And it’s all about the butterscotch. It lends an intense yet creamy flavor to the final product. As a matter of fact, I sampled the custard so often after it was mixed that I made a serious dent in the amount of custard I had left to cook with. Yikes!

9 Filling Ramekins 9614

7 Twitter Logo Tag

Sometimes I will make changes to a recipe when I am testing it out – alterations that make it more to my taste. But I made no major changes to this recipe. Just three extremely minor things.

First, I am not a big fan of extra large desserts. Thus, instead of the 5-ounce ramekins called for in the recipe, I used 3-ounce ramekins. Which worked out fine – it’s a very rich dessert. Secondly, I cut the recipe down by half. If you do the same, keep in mind that half of a ¼ cup is 1 fluid ounce (a standard shoot glass is 1 ounce).

10 Baking Pot de Cremes 9634

11 Butterscotch Pot de Creme3 9783

Lastly, I topped the dessert with chocolate shavings to add a bit of extra sweetness to the palette. This was the right move. The chocolate gave an extra bit of dimension giving the final dessert a wonderfully complex flavor profile. Plus, it added great visual texture.

This dessert is definitely a keeper.

Cheers!

12 Butterscotch Pot de Creme4 9721

13 Butterscotch Pot de Creme5 9760

BUTTERSCOTCH POT DE CRÈME

GQ Magazine, September 2009

6 egg yolks

¼ cup packed dark brown sugar

1 cup milk

2 cups heavy cream

¾ granulated sugar

1 TSP pure vanilla extract

1 TSP kosher salt

¼ cup butter-sweet chocolate, shavings (for garnish)

Preheat oven to 300⁰F.

Place egg yolks in a large bowl and lightly whisk till smooth. Set aside.

Over a medium high flame, heat the brown sugar, milk and heavy cream in a heavy saucepan and stir until brown sugar start to dissolve. Then heat until the milk is steaming and tiny bubbles have formed along the edges, but do not boil. Remove from heat. Cover and keep warm.

In a medium saucepan, combine the granulated sugar with ¼ cup of water and bring to a boil over high heat. As soon as the sugar turns amber (ideally the color of a new penny), remove from heat. Carefully add ¼ cup of the hot cream mixture, whisking until combined. Whisk in 2 more cups of the cream mixture, then add the rest.

Pour the caramel cream into the yolk in a slow, steady stream and gently whisking the mixture continuously. Stir in the vanilla and salt. Strain the custard through a fine strainer (or sieve) into a pitcher. Skim off any foam or bubbles on top.

Pout the custard into six 5-ounce ramekins, leaving ½ inch at the top of each. Place ramekins in a roasting pan and carefully fill the pan with hot water until it comes halfway up their sides. Carefully cover the pan with foil.

Bake in the oven for 45-50 minutes until set. When done, the center may still a bit loose when the custard is gently shaken.

Remove the pan from the oven and let the crème finish setting in the water bath at room temperature uncovered. When cool, refrigerate uncovered to preserve the burnished color.

Makes 6 5-ounce (or 10 3-ounce) desserts

{ 5 trackbacks }

Butterscotch Pot de Creme – Ceramic Canvas | Happy Happy Joy Joy
January 21, 2010 at 6:37 am
Around The Web: Tea Revives You Edition « Rachael Blogs…
April 14, 2011 at 4:13 am
BAKING POT | Kitchen Appliances & Accessories
July 12, 2011 at 11:02 pm
Around The Web: Tea Revives You Edition | Rachael Blogs
July 30, 2011 at 12:07 pm
recipe | delightfully midwestern
April 16, 2013 at 10:08 pm

{ 20 comments… read them below or add one }

Sook @ My Fabulous Recipes January 20, 2010 at 4:09 pm

BEAUTIFUL!! I would love to try these. yum!

Alan January 20, 2010 at 4:31 pm

Yummy! Great pick!

Phyllis January 20, 2010 at 6:44 pm

Voluptuous is the word, Reg. I can feel spoonfuls in my mouth and the mouth feel is great. Thanks for the recipe and, again, the photos catapult these custards right off the screen.

Kate January 21, 2010 at 9:38 am

I’m utterly mesmerized by both the photos and the recipe. I can taste them, each rich and voluminous mouthful.

Joan January 21, 2010 at 10:22 am
Reginald January 21, 2010 at 4:27 pm

SOOK & Alan: Thanks.
.
PHYLLIS & KATE: I think you’re both right, ‘voluptuous’ and ‘voluminous’ capture the feel of the dessert far better than lush.
.
JOAN: Thanks for the Orangette link.

Stuart January 21, 2010 at 8:14 pm

Amazing photography and the food does look good. I will be back for more soon!

Memoria January 21, 2010 at 8:44 pm

These photos are beautiful. I’ll be bookmarking this recipe.

On the ingredient list, you wrote “butter-sweet”, did you mean “bittersweet”? If not, what is “butter-sweet chocolate”? If you did mean “bittersweet”, doesn’t “butter-sweet” sound so good anyway?! haha

katelyn stout January 23, 2010 at 1:23 am

i love this website. so brilliant. where did you get those ADORABLE dishes? i love them.

Somebody's Mom January 30, 2010 at 8:15 am

Reggie, as always another beautiful photo layout. I love the little “pots”!

Reginald February 18, 2010 at 9:57 am

MEMORIA: Thanks. And oppps, yeap, I meant “bittersweet” chocolate. :)

Becky July 12, 2010 at 8:50 am

Lovely. Absolutely lovely. I am as enamoured of the dishes as I am the recipe. Would you mind telling me where did you find your pots de creme dishes? I would love to get a set myself.

Reginald July 12, 2010 at 10:23 am

BECKY: Thanks! I got the mini-ramekins at Fishs Eddy (I love this store) in NYC. A big portion of their inventory is dedicated to ‘slightly used’ restaurant/hotel dinnerware. These ramekins (at $1 each) were one of those, “I like these. They’re so cheap. I’m not sure how I will use them or if I even need them but I’ll get a set of 12 just in case I have an emergency need to serve 12 people miniature desserts.” :)

Becky July 13, 2010 at 2:12 am

Thanks Reg! I have ordered from Fishes Eddy, but have never been to the store. It sounds like it would be great fun. Your dishes looked to me like they could be Homer Laughlin’s Gothic line that they sell to hotels, restaurants, etc. It comes in plain white as well as some designs, including a maroon stripe. Are yours marked? I will check this out further.

Cat Davis April 7, 2011 at 2:37 pm

Oh my! My mouth is watering looking at those!

Reginald April 7, 2011 at 3:43 pm

CAT DAVIS: hey are one of ay favorite desserts. And because the recipe uses ingredients that I usually have on hand, I have made them on the spur of the moment before. Be warned they are very rich (and equally delish), so the bittersweet chocolate really helps to give them balance. Enjoy.

marta April 11, 2011 at 8:21 pm

Wow – your photos are amazing! Beautiful blog – so happy I stumbled upon it :)

StacyNicole April 12, 2012 at 10:50 pm

This looks amazing!! I’d love to try it…but you left out the measurement for the granulated sugar…is it 3/4 cup granulated sugar?

Reginald April 12, 2012 at 11:06 pm

STACY NICOLE: Thanks for catching that. Yes, it’s 3/4 cups of regular sugar. Let us know how it goes. ;)

sarah May 13, 2013 at 3:11 pm

made this a few times before and it was delicious but i made it today and even though the mixture seemed perfectly fine, when i took them out of the oven the consistency was kind of lumpy rather than smooth, with an excess of clear liquid that drained into sections where i took a spoonful out. Just wondering if you’v any ideas why this may have happened?

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: